Comparative advertising: Truth or dare?

Comparative advertising: Truth or dare?

Just when you thought it couldn’t get worse, another one pops up to take the detested crown. I’m referring to advertisements that make you cringe and the latest in the line is the HUL’s (Hindustan Unilever)  Rin commercial which clearly derides P&G’s Tide washing powder.

If you haven’t seen it, here it is.

 

 

Both HUL and P&G have made comparative ads in the past, usually passing snide references at each other.  In the past however, these references to the competition were muted or masked.

Some may argue that in a highly competitive market where product differentiation is minimal, comparative advertising can make the difference. But then bashing your competition is the easiest thing to do, and you don’t need a creative agency to get that done.

However, there are exceptions to this route as is evident in this car commercial.

Personally to me, comparative advertising is a sign of lethargy and creative myopia. To get back at the competition don’t get bitter, get better!


Facebook comments:

2 Comments »
  1. avatar comment-top

    The rumour is that began with a truck carrying stock to the market met with an accident and the entire load was destroyed (in UP). It was blamed on the competitor. This ad is a reply.

    comment-bottom
  2. avatar comment-top

    The sons look like bigger retards than the mothers in the rin ad. The Tide-boy looks like he’s wearin a brown shirt instead of a white. At the end of the day if the Rin-boy’s shirt is still sparkling white, it’ could just meant the he a book-worm bloke.
    How can people come up with such subjective advertisements and how can these ads cause a raise in sales; surely there must be something wrong with the buyers.
    As far as the products are concerned, sure, Rin could be better than Tide but surely there could be a better ad than that.

    comment-bottom

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment